In the wake of such horror, we can expect to hear the
usual cries for “tolerance” and the throb-in-the-throat pleas not to let the “extremists”
win. But the trouble is the extremists won long ago. What other word can you
use for political parties like the Conservative and Labour Parties that have
been creating cultural chaos and enacting genocide and race replacement on a massive scale?
The only extremists are those holding the reins of
government, as they have been doing for the last 60 years. But they would have
you believe that they are the “moderates,” the reasonable ones, and that the
extremists are the "unrepresentative" Muslims who committed the Woolwich atrocity and the “Far
Right" parties and organizations who have opposed
mass immigration and the kind of multiracialism that has Sub-Saharan Muslims
living cheek-by-slashed-jowl with troops serving the interests of America
and Israel.
The Muslims who committed this atrocity are not
extremists. They are following one of the broadest roads in a major world religion, a
religion that grew up among a band of desert cutthroats and expanded by
conquest, violence, intimidation, slavery, and mass rape; a religion that
tolerates nothing but itself and drives its more logical adherents to acts of
violence.
A so-called “moderate” Muslim is nothing more than a
bad Muslim, someone who probably drinks alcohol and eats pork as well. A good
Muslim is one who acts within the genocidal dictates of the religion’s founder.
Needless to say, the rest of us should avoid good Muslims like the plague and
be wary of bad Muslims in case they start taking their religion seriously.
The so-called “racists” and “fascists” who
oppose
multiracial Britain and wish not only to stop mass immigration but also
to
start the necessary process of “exigration” – the removal of the
unassimilatable
immigrant population – are not the extremists either. These people are
common
sense moderates, who, despite the lies of their higher and betters and
the endless extremist propaganda of the “multicultural” state, realized
at
some gut level that the ruling elites were creating a madhouse.
The extremists are David Cameron, Gordon Brown, Tony
Blair, John Major, Margaret Thatcher, Jim Callaghan, Harold Wilson, Douglas
Hume, Harold McMillan, and Anthony Eden, the prime ministers who facilitated the
process by which Britain has been transformed into the Bedlam it is today.
The extremists are the media, the BBC and the newspapers
of the oligarchs, who have bandied about the word “racist” in an attempt to
suppress any opposition to the Third World colonization of Britain, in effect
creating a society whose every second thought is now race.
The extremists are the academics, who have used their
intelligence to blind themselves for the pleasures of sneering at lowly common
sense and basking in the glow of a false moral smugness, while furthering their
lie-driven careers.
But the extremists are also the majority of the
British people who have voted for these politicians, listened to these
journalists, and respected these academics, all the while feeling that
something was deeply wrong.
Things like the increasing imposition of multicultural
totalitarianism and the Woolwich atrocity that it pathetically failed to stop
are not accidents. They are the symptoms of a deep disease of the political
system. This disease is extremism, but not as the mass media uses the term.
Extremism exists naturally at the extreme ends of any
system. Think of it like a bell curve. The left and right sides of the curve –
the ‘extremes’ – taper to nothing, while the centre bulges to the highest point
and contains most of the mass.
The fact that extremes exist in any system is not a
problem in itself, and, in the grand scheme of things, may even be necessary.
The problem we have in the West is that “the bulge” has been dislocated so that
now the weight of opinion and power has been dislocated to the extreme Left for
the last 60 years.
What is ‘centric’ or moderate about the ideas on which
modern Britain is based? Nothing! The viewpoint that race is a construct, that
blood exerts no pull on the human heart, that loyalty to your own kind is evil,
and that we are all blank slates is self-evidently an extremist Leftist one,
but it is one that has become displaced towards the centre of our society.
What is “extremist” about the wish to prevent your
country being colonized and your race sunk in a flood of Third World
immigration, degradation, and animalistic violence? This is self evidently a
centric notion, but in today’s insane world this is given the name “far-right,”
“fascist,” or “racist,” all words signifying extremism and evil.
Sensible common sense, the traditional outlook of the
vast majority, is now regarded as right-wing extremism. But what has caused
this dislocation of the political spectrum? The causes are many, but
essentially it is the switch from a society characterized by structure, ties,
and values to one based on fluidity, nexus, and price. This shift requires a change
in the basic concept of humanity from a static notion based on essence and
being to a dynamic notion based on function and interaction: synapses instead
of neurons, algebra instead of numbers.
This results in the cult of “androidism,” where
anything man-shaped is considered equivalent and connected to every other thing
that is man-like, with the ability to acquire money the only distinguisher.
This is how multinationals, super states, and global elites see the world, and
it creates the fluidity and interchangeability required by late-period global capitalism
to facilitate more economic interactions, be they Keynsian or Austrian, public sector
or private. To revert to a world of structure, ties, and values would cause an
economic meltdown (actually much to be desired), so we are forced to live outside our mental comfort zone and
fall down before the Golden Calf of multiculturalism.
The extremists who control the West see androidism as a
means to facilitate short-term economic interests – their own and also that of the
wider society (hence the widespread support for this stupidity) – but they also
see it as a solution to the problems that it creates. Not only does androidism
broaden markets, enlarge the labour pool, and create marketable stresses and
problems, but it also promises the solution to the chaos it unleashes in the
vast reprogramming of the human race.
Be the subjects Sub-Saharans with markedly lower IQs
or Muslims with a deeply incompatible culture, the androidist extremists who control
the West believe that they can use “education” and “culture” to maintain the
status quo in their vast game of demographic musical chairs. Sub-Saharans can
be educated to replace low-breeding Europeans and Muslims can be culturally reprogrammed
by the potency and insidiousness of Western popular culture.
In this view, the great multiracial cities of West are
educational laboratories doing what has never been done before, or vast
cultural concentration camps exterminating the awkward culture of the incomers
in a flood of porn, feminism, consumerism individualism, and sheer godlessness.
Credit where it’s due: This is a titanic theory and
astounding in its scope – if it works.
But the great flaw with extreme ideas is that they are extreme for a
reason,
and this reason is their more tenuous connection with reality. This is
how you
know they are extreme. This is the case with androidism. Just because
someone
has two arms and two legs, and walks upright, doesn’t mean that he is
equivalent to all the other two-armed and two-legged creatures walking
upright. The atrocity in Woolwich is a graphic example of this much
denied truism."